Density a Hot-Button Issue as Initial Plans for Lathrop Redevelopment Revealed

By Patty Wetli | Tuesday, September 25, 2012

What will the Lathrop Homes redevelopment look like? Hamlin Park Neighbors want to make sure they have a say. Credit: Flickr/metroblossom

With the cancellation of a planned Sept. 27 meeting to introduce redevelopment plans for the Lathrop Homes, combined with Ald. Scott Waguespack (32nd) posting initial designs online (see below), the board members of Hamlin Park Neighbors (HPN) are concerned the train is about to leave the station without them and have decided to play a more vocal role in the Lathrop process.

Originally, according to board president Charles Beach, HPN’s intention was to serve merely as a conduit of information. “As time goes on, we as a board have come to a conclusion…it’s time to start formulating a voice about these things.”

Speaking at Monday night’s monthly HPN meeting, held at the New Life Community Church, 2928 N. Damen Ave., Beach stated, “Things are starting to get put down on paper. We need people to become more vocal or active…. We want the alderman to know that we’re paying attention; we want the developer to know that we’re paying attention.”

Current proposals range from a plan that would create 1,322 new housing units evenly split north and south of Diversey to renderings of a 1,610-unit development with nearly 400 units preserved in historic buildings. All of the plans employ creative amenities such as wetlands, a river promenade, amphitheater and community gardens, along with space set aside for restaurants and retail shopping. None of the plans indicates the percentage of units devoted to low-income, affordable and/or market-rate housing.

“Things like density are going to be the hot-button issue,” said Beach. “How much are we willing to tolerate?”

Already, in the absence of public comment from developers, rumors have spread that one of the plans incorporates a 48-story tower. Not true, but misinformation will persist until debunked. That’s one of the reasons Ald. Waguespack posted the proposals online, according to his chief of staff, Paul Sajovec, who attended the HPN meeting.

“It’s our hope there is open, honest opportunity for some feedback,” said Sajovec. “He [Waguespack] needed to get that conversation going sooner than later.”

Kerry Dickson, senior vice president with Related Midwest, a member of Lathrop’s redevelopment consortium, was also present at the HPN meeting as an observer. He jumped into the fray to clarify his team’s position. “Our goal is to make a presentation the community can understand,” he said. “We think it’s a six- to eight-month process of dialogue.”

HPN’s goal is to make sure its members are actively engaged when that dialogue does ultimately occur. Said board member Stacy Thomas, “We need to show up in force.”

Lathrop Homes Redevelopment — Initial Designs

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Share this now!

  • phaedrus

    I hope the surrounding community realizes the importance of this project and are ready to fight for their homes. The decisions made at Lathrop will shape the ‘quality of living’ in Hamlin Park/Roscoe Village for decades. 50% of Lathrop is surrounded by the river, making the density numbers they’re speaking of absurd. All traffic will be bottled into a small space, and as the neighbors know, the current traffic is already at a maximum with no plan to alleviate it.
    Centralized housing is a lazy answer for Chicago’s housing problems. It breeds crime and polarizes neighborhoods. We as neighbors cannot let them recreate a Lathrop ‘on steroids’ going from what was 900 units to 1,322-1600 units. In august Chicago became the number 1 foreclosure city in the country with a 40% increase year over year. The city doesn’t need more housing, it needs better ideas. This site could be one of the most beautiful destinations in the city. One that deserves more than the ‘plagues’ of centralized housing.

  • http://twitter.com/leecrandell Lee Crandell

    How would the density compare with surrounding blocks? Looking at the plans, the homes on the block to the east seem packed in even more densely than the plan for the Lathrop site. Lathrop was a very spread-out, low-density housing project — it makes sense to restore the density to be more in character with the surrounding urban neighborhood.

    • phaedrus

      yes, but the surrounding urban neighborhood is not surrounded by a river. The surrounding community has exits on all sides, whereas Lathrop only has exits on the east and even after the plans are executed only 50% of the project will have exits. This is an untenable situation for traffic.

  • Ivan Franco

    god i hate Gentrification.. my family lived in that neighborhood for 50 years and we are now being kicked out because all the yuppies are knocking down our homes and raising taxes…

  • Pingback: CHA Releases Lathrop Homes Promo Video; Open House This Weekend | Roscoe View Journal

  • Pingback: 32nd Ward Alderman Unhappy With Lathrop Plans, Process | Roscoe View Journal

Spread the word